About this Blog

This blog results from a combination of my passion for writing and my random thought processes. From life experiences to pet peeves to witty quips to serious thoughts to absolutely randomness, this blog covers a wide array of topics. Some blog posts may cause you to think while others may cause you to laugh. My only hope is that you will be entertained. Feel free to leave me feedback or comments.

Friday, January 21, 2011

offended

I think most people would agree that the word "offended" is vastly overused these days. There is no way that some people are actually offended as often as they claim to be. Either that, or people have become way too sensitive. Regardless, I usually roll my eyes at the sound of the word. I will be giving a good example of this tomorrow, as this is not the purpose of today's blog post.

The point of this blog post is to bring up something that actually offended me. And I am not easily offended (which you may have deduced from the statements made in the first paragraph). I'm not going to make a stink about it or anything like that, but I'd be lying if I claimed that I wasn't offended. And believe me when I tell you that I tried. I tried to laugh it off (it does humor me to an extent, as I do not take myself very serious).

So, what offended me to the point of blogging about it? It all went down Wednesday night. I was relaxing at home, watching television. I was minding my own business when a commercial came on. It was the first time I had ever seen this particular commercial. I'm curious if anyone else has ever seen it. Let me describe it for you:

The commercial showed numerous people in various work environments. They each started pushing on a wall. Eventually they each break through their wall. It shows them walking through the broken wall. One was a security guard working in a "guard shack." One was a grocery store employee. There were numerous other jobs featured. Then it mentions how if you earn your GED you can break through the barriers that have been holding you back. Turns out it was a GED commercial.

So, here's my problem. Most of you probably know that I'm a youth pastor. Because my position is only part-time, I need a full-time job to supplement my income. My secondary job (though admittedly the majority of my income): Security Officer. Where do I work? In a "guard shack" (though we call it a "kiosk"). I find it incredibly offensive and disrespectful to people who hold these jobs to suggest that it's a barrier to break through. I love my job. And not only do I already have a high school diploma, but I have a B.A. So, I'm pretty sure that not all security officers are high school dropouts as the commercial implies (or so I inferred from it).

I don't typically get offended by things, but I thought this commercial was incredibly outrageous. I took it quite personally. I still think most people overreact (see tomorrow's blog) but I learned a lesson here none the less: Sometimes, people might actually be legitimately offended, as I was the other day.

4 comments:

Christopher C. Parker said...

I can easily see how one could interpret that commercial as saying those specific jobs are barriers to break through.

How I've come to understand the commercial is such that the individuals working the jobs personally saw their jobs as barriers. Anybody who's unhappy with their job could see their job as something that's holding them back. In this case, these specific people thought their jobs were holding them back, and they thought they couldn't do anything they thought was better without a high school diploma/GED.

Do I think the commercial was done in poor taste? Sure. It did kind of relegate the professions in the commercial to the status of "cheap", "undesirable", or "fitting for the uneducated". I think that the people responsible for the commercial probably didn't put as much thought into it as they should have. I think the commercial could have been made just as effective without more or less insulting certain professions, using different and more creative imagery. However, I personally don't think that was the intention; I'm pretty sure it was supposed to be focusing on the individual people's feelings about their jobs, regardless of what they were.

Mike Brown said...

Completely valid point Chris. I don't believe their intent was to offend either. In order to make a point about how a GED could help, they picked jobs they deemed to be held by those without a GED. It wouldn't have made sense to have a lawyer breaking through a wall because he/she has a GED. So, I get that. But that doesn't change the fact that I was in fact offended. I think security gets a bad rap. I personally hold Paul Blart responsible for this. Thanks again for chiming in Chris with some valuable feedback.

Cassidy :) said...

i didn't see that commercial. i'm almost never offended, but that's because, really, i don't seem to be bothered by things people say about me. i know i'm rather tall and skinny, but i'm not an amazon or a toothpick. so when people comment on how my skinny jeans make my legs look like chicken legs, i say, "and those shoes make your feet look bigger then your head."

Jonathan Brown said...

hey Mike it's better than the radio ad I heard yesterday for the GED saying something to the effect that after your GED you can feel fulfilled and get off unemployment and welfare easier!!!! Obviously the only people on welfare and unemployment are HS dropouts!!! Ad done in very poor taste!!!